The DirectDemocracy system rewrites, redesigns, redefines, changes, and improves society, all over the world, and because of this there are lobbies, almost all other systems, entire states, dictators, almost all the old, failed traditional political forces, many alternative political groups, and even some superficial people, who are afraid of our system.

As we always say: those who have done nothing wrong have no logical reason to fear us.

And all the others, if they try in every way to remedy their mistakes, will not suffer serious consequences.

We were never born to fight against old systems, or even to change them. Fighting them would be counterproductive, and would risk "innocent victims," while trying to change them would be a waste of time, and improving them would be impossible.

DirectDemocracyS is made up of an endless series of good ideas and projects, proposed by anyone who joins us, and in many cases, even by those who criticize us from the outside.

This last sentence is very important, because it explains the creation of the system, which is a long, arduous, detailed, and very complicated collective effort, not that of a few individuals or groups. There are no internal or external lobbies to help, no individuals to favor, and no interests to defend, except the interests of all the people in the world. Without preferences, without discrimination, without envy, and without hatred.

DirectDemocracyS is based on the greatest force in the universe, which is undoubtedly love, and this characteristic of ours makes us unique and inimitable.

We also have a unique feature: we transform criticism into proposals, and if they're deemed valid, they're integrated into our system and implemented. While constructive criticism initially represented concrete ideas and projects that could be used, now that we've already created all the fundamental rules, most of the very important rules, and many important rules, we use criticism of all kinds primarily to better explain some very important concepts. In any case, we want to thank those within, and even outside, who have contributed to creating a comprehensive and virtually unassailable system.

But let's talk about some fears that many people have because of us.

The biggest question at the beginning was who was behind it. And theories began to surface, based on suppositions, conspiracies, and we initially toyed with them, even having fun. The truth is very simple: even those who have joined us now, those who will join us in the future, and even those who won't join us but have contacted us with questions and suggestions, have contributed decisively to creating our system. We have serious reasons for hiding the names and surnames of the first five members (the creators), and of the subsequent 277 members (creators of the fundamental rules and architects of the system), as well as all the others who brought the initial ideas to fruition. But if we guarantee everyone the ability to be completely invisible (both from the outside and from the inside), and the option of remaining forever anonymous (using a nickname or a random code), we must guarantee these important opportunities to those who join us, from the first to the last user. But we must guarantee the confidentiality of personal data, including those who contact us and anyone who collaborates with us, even those outside our system. The personal choice of whether or not to be public figures must be guaranteed to everyone, and protected forever, for anyone, we repeat: inside or outside our system. Then there are those who, failing to correctly assess the importance and potential of DirectDemocracyS, fail to consider the potential risks, including physical ones, not only to our initial members, but especially to their families. They have created something of disruptive power, which will undoubtedly change and improve the world, but these improvements will surely annoy very powerful, wealthy, and famous individuals and lobbies, who will try in every way, futilely and unsuccessfully, to boycott us, slow us down, and even stop us. They will use every legal, and even illegal, means, every falsehood, and every possible "trick" against us, who will be able to respond with intelligence and determination. For these reasons, our attention to security measures, and the investments in this regard, are normal, and certainly not excessive.

The fear of granting too much power to DirectDemocracyS is illogical, and only those who are envious or hate us can truly believe that by making our existence known to everyone and winning elections everywhere, we would become the dictators of the world and pose a risk to humanity. These fears are unjustified, because from the very beginning, we were aware of the enormous responsibility we would have in managing the enormous power we will gain, and we have made it impossible for our system to take away freedom and democracy. We have created it morphologically impossible to corrupt, modify, influence, sabotage, and exploit in an ethically and morally incorrect manner.

To understand these rules, we need to take a step back to the moment when five people decided to create an innovative system, completely different from all others, with the goal of changing and improving the world. None of those present knew how to do it; there was no know-how, not even an instruction manual, to create a system from scratch. They decided to do it, fully aware of the enormous challenges and risks involved.

They knew it would be impossible to fight against the various systems, and impossible to change and improve them, so they took the most difficult and courageous path: creating the best system in human history. To do everything efficiently, they decided to first create the best political organization in human history, taking the very few positive aspects from all political forces and completely eliminating all the negative aspects. To begin this complex work of creation, 277 competent people from nearly every country in the world were selected. Brilliant minds, young and old, women and men, representing nearly all the major peoples of the earth, virtually all traditions and cultures, and the main religions. To be part of this initial group, number 00, called the initiators, creators, and guarantors, only one thing was asked of them: to set aside all divisions, to create a system that unites (with the slogan "united in diversity") , to set aside interests, to consider the needs and interests of all the good people of the earth, and to create something that will have an indefinite duration, to restore all power and dignity to the people, to all peoples, and not to individual political forces. An unattainable utopia? Study our system with a comprehensive, open mind, and you will understand that it is a concrete reality. Among the many important things to do was to foresee every possible problem and resolve it before having to actually address it. We created a joint group for the foresight and early resolution of potential problems.

Predicting the future isn't very difficult; just look to the past, and you'll find plenty of inspiration. Mainly, it's about "what not to do," and the most challenging part has been finding the right innovations to make our system complete and unassailable.

Over time, we've faced several potential problems to solve. The first of these is preventing anyone from misusing our system. We've created foolproof security measures, often copied without mentioning us by many others, because while they didn't invade anyone's privacy, they guaranteed us optimal protection. We've made them gradual and increasingly detailed, based on the user type of anyone who joins us, including our official representatives and our political representatives, who as such must, and always will, be willing to be fully vetted, as they publicly represent us (our official representatives) and represent our constituents (our political representatives) in elections and in institutions. If public figures had nothing to hide, they should have no problem complying with our rules and all the necessary checks to prevent any potential problems.

But it wasn't enough to have clean representatives; they also had to remain so, forever. Therefore, our checks had to be continuous over time, and we also had to use various tests to continually verify their honesty and reliability. We tempt them with gifts, money, and perks, to see if they give in to temptation. It's not about being dishonest, but we prefer to be the ones to uncover and force dishonest and liars to resign early, rather than suffer the consequences of their decisions, or worse, suffer the damage to our system's reputation that a single corrupt, thieving, lying, or unreliable representative can cause to DirectDemocracyS. Just look at how many people generalize, saying the worst things about the political class, obviously, sparing only their own favorites, to whom they forgive everything.

We are very strict with those who transgress our rules, which are all based on logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect. We defend all our official representatives and all our political representatives intelligently and with all legal means, precisely because we are certain that these people deserve it. But if someone, anyone, lies to us even once, after analyzing the situation and judging their motives, we will always scrutinize everything they tell us. If someone steals, we will never trust them again, and we will never again assign them positions of great importance and greater responsibility. We will never put wolves to guard the sheep , but will choose competent, reliable, honest, and incorruptible people.

We had to find a way to force them to resign if they were found engaging in unethical activities: we created and made mandatory for everyone an irrevocable resignation for personal reasons, which must be completed and signed before applying for or obtaining any role. This may seem unfair, and in some cases illegal, but it is a morally and ethically unassailable decision for anyone. If one did not doubt oneself, one should have no problem signing an early resignation. As for legality, respect for all our rules is a free and democratic choice made by informed people who propose, discuss, test, and vote on all our laws. Therefore, everyone knows the respective rules, has decided them together, and will respect them because they are part of our identity.

In practice: everyone knows that in DirectDemocracyS these early resignations exist, for all roles, to demand loyalty, reliability, and competence, therefore, those who do not accept and implement them, can run for office in other systems, and political forces.

We also needed to prevent a few users, or groups, from accumulating too much power, so we created our own truly and completely shared leadership, composed of all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, and, most importantly, the right of collective ownership by all our official members. These two unique characteristics, and our immutable fundamental rules, make us incorruptible and prevent us from managing the entire world at will. No one will stop anyone from becoming, at the right time, our registered user with verified and guaranteed identities; thus, from being a real-time participant in all our decisions, or, later, if they wish, from becoming our own. We do not discriminate against anyone, as anyone can join us and receive their share of the power gained from our system, which, as we always repeat, is and will forever remain completely shared.

There are many other features that should reassure our detractors. First and foremost, our voters' complete management and continuous, total control over their political representatives, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after the elections. This same bottom-up control is also internal, with our base, through shared leadership, managing and controlling all our higher hierarchies. A perfect balance between traditional leadership (competent and meritocratic) and bottom-up direct democracy. We know it seems incredible, but almost everyone, when they hear about something so radical and pioneering, is initially wary. Superficial people, who are of no use to us in the initial stages, don't get informed and criticize regardless, while compatible and competent people, who are useful at all stages, study and then make informed judgments.

Welcome to the DirectDemocracyS website. For us, it is a pleasure and an honor to have you here.

Everything in a nutshell.

DirectDemocracyS: Democratic and meritocratic revolution. An ever-expanding system (politics, economics, finance, social). Each member is a co-owner, with total control and shared leadership. Website: directdemocracys.org. Study thoroughly before judging!

If, after reading this, you want to join us, please read this important informational article carefully before doing so: 

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/activity-rules/email-rules/problems-with-certain-email-providers 

We are often asked to summarize our entire system in a few words, and although it is impossible to summarize DirectDemocracyS in a few sentences, we want to try.

But first of all, a brief introduction.

Don't try to dismiss as banal and simplify everything we've created, not for ourselves, but for yourselves; you risk making a terrible impression. Saying things like: you haven't invented anything new, or, there are systems better than yours, or the worst, most false, and most ridiculous thing: there are other systems, organizations, and political forces that do the same things you do! Not out of vanity, not out of presumption, but to analyze reality, telling only the truth: there has never existed, there does not exist, and there never will be, a system more innovative, alternative, complete, professional, fair, just, loyal, honest, free, democratic, independent, self-sufficient, neutral, orderly, organized, logical, common-sense, and secure than the one we created with so much effort, after a long, complicated, and hard work.

A system created collectively by all those who are part of it, with a lot of help, and many suggestions, often involuntary even from outside.

From the very first moment, we wanted to create the best system, and the best political force in human history, one that is constantly evolving and always improving, thanks to the ideas, proposals, concrete projects, and direct work of anyone who joins us.

DirectDemocracyS's strength, among many others, is that it guarantees everyone complete, perpetual equality, combined with meritocracy. Any competing system that doesn't concretely implement equality and meritocracy together is doomed to fail, to implode upon itself, or to create the disasters that all other systems create.

Perhaps one of the many fundamentals is specificity and attention to every single detail, which requires everyone within us, everyone who contacts us, and everyone who collaborates with us externally to consistently respect all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations. Our first rule is that everyone must always respect all our rules, without exception. The three preceding words demonstrate the power of a system where no one can be cunning, no one can exploit the system to gain advantages and benefits that are not fully deserved and ethically and morally irreproachable.

Not being able to outsmart others initially makes our system less attractive, both because of excessive superficiality and the laziness of those who don't want to waste precious time studying all our public information with an open mind and in a comprehensive manner. Fortunately, all people with above-average intelligence, and in general the majority of good people, don't judge a book by its cover, don't read just the headlines or a few sentences, and don't skip over the parts they think they understand in everything we publish. This allows us to have wonderful, competent people who are compatible with our system.

After this brief but necessary introduction, you'll have understood that we're not just another beautiful project, and that if you combined all the very few positive aspects of all the other systems or groups, completely eliminating every negative aspect, you wouldn't even have 10% of DirectDemocracyS. Among the interesting things about our political organization is our ideal, created by all our users, who come from every political force, representing all political parties, all peoples, and all countries in the world. Here too, our political ideal is based on logic, common sense, and the truth, fully documented by reliable sources and verified by our expert groups, composed of our official members, based on their respective expertise (declared, documented, and verified), on research (always declared, documented, and verified by our expert groups, which all our official members can join, based on their expertise), and on implementing mutual respect among all people.

To find out our official position on practically everything, please refer to the previous sentences.

Let's begin a short and incomplete list, with our strengths that make us the best, unique, and inimitable, with some explanations, and with some motivations.

A truly and completely shared leadership, free of traditional hierarchies, but entirely new. We don't have a few leaders, a few power groups, and a few bosses. We are all together, one immense and virtually infallible leader, of which all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, are an integral part. Don't criticize us for checking your identity anywhere in the world. To vote, the first mandatory step is to identify yourself, to prevent the creation of multiple personal profiles or fake ones. Each person can join us only once, by registering and creating a single personal profile. Anyone who meets the requirements and respects all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations can join us and become our registered user, with verified and guaranteed identities, and thus be part of our shared leadership.

Brief explanation.

Some people tell us that, in theory, our shared leadership could only serve our own interests, and that once we gain all the power worldwide, DirectDemocracyS could be dangerous to democracy. Not only that, many "experts" tell us that we could be too powerful, thus creating a "dictatorship of the majority" over the minority, making ourselves a "danger to democracy." Let's respond immediately to this last illogical and stupid statement. We do so with a question: in current systems, who rules for long periods after elections? Who wins the majority? So why are we dangerous, even though we govern and make the laws, always and only obeying our voters, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections?

Explanation of the explanation.

Add to our strengths the following statement: the political organization DirectDemocracyS is the first and only one in the world that allows its voters complete management and control over their platforms, their voters, and all its political representatives, before, during, and after elections. We are the only authentic, complete, real, direct, and secure democracy. The only one in which political representatives implement and enforce every decision of those who have given them the power of representation. Control from the bottom up, as is right in every democracy.

No oligarchic partycracy, no dictatorship, only justice, fairness, and exceptional security measures.

If these fundamental rules weren't enough for you, we add another: every decision within our system must be made with the well-being and interests of the entire world population as its objective, without exclusion or preference, whether within or outside our system. We hope you've understood the importance and implications of the previous sentence. We can never decide only for ourselves, but we will change and improve the world for the good of all.

At this point, there will be those who say to us: fine words, but how can you prove it?

Other systems and all other political forces demonstrate to you with facts that they don't work only for your interests, but for the various lobbies that have always controlled almost all other political forces and their respective political representatives, with often tragic consequences that you all see. In our system, everything is voted on openly (one shouldn't be ashamed of one's ideas), verifiably (everyone sees that their vote has been counted exactly as they cast it), with reasoning (every decision must be justified, to demonstrate that one is acting for the common good), and above all, everyone who votes, individually, in groups, but also as an entire system, assumes full responsibility for all the consequences of our decisions. Carefully analyze what we write, and try to understand the implications and motivations of what we say. Do so with an open mind, not comparing us to your beloved old traditional systems, which are failing, as demonstrated by the global public debt. We will not attempt to eliminate them, thanks to financial and economic macro-policies created by the world's best experts. They will be radical, pioneering, but with beneficial effects for everyone.

We always begin by helping those most in need first, and for as long as necessary. This isn't a slogan to gain consensus; it's our fundamental rule, which requires unanimity to change. Here, we've also answered a potential question: it's all wonderful, but you might change your mind once you gain power. We were created as a system of constant evolution and integration, but without any possibility of changing the fundamental rules, so as to never forget why we were created, all our goals, and how we will achieve them.

Collective ownership rights of all our official members, who are not only part of our shared leadership but also jointly own our entire system. This is the feature that prevents anyone from taking control of DirectDemocracyS, and prevents the system itself from becoming too "dangerous" and too powerful when it wins all the elections in the world. By distributing complete ownership of everything, with all official members having access, management, and control literally everywhere, both individually and in groups, based on simple, secure, orderly, and organized implementing rules, it makes it very difficult, practically impossible, and certainly unlikely to create dictatorships or preferential policies. The rule is simple: each of our official members will automatically receive a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual share, making them collectively the owner of our entire system. And anyone who qualifies and respects our rules can become our official member at the right time. So we don't discriminate against anyone.

We have specialist groups made up of all our official members (i.e., anyone who owns our site), based on declared, documented, verified, and guaranteed expertise. These expert groups inform all our users about the various decisions to be made, the various options, and the expected consequences. With informed and competent choices, including the integration of technology, we will move closer to perfection.

The phrase that scares everyone the most: only on our platforms.

DirectDemocracyS operates and conducts all its activities exclusively on its own platforms, and the reasons are so obvious and numerous that it would take numerous informative articles to explain them all. Suffice it to say that we like to be free, independent, self-funded, neutral, and work safely, in an orderly, and organized manner. That's why we've created our large, protected home, where we welcome anyone who wants to join us, with good intentions, to change and improve the world.

We have little presence outside of our system; we simply let a few people know we exist and what we're doing. Otherwise, if you have any questions, please contact us. We have a website entirely dedicated to contacting you, with numerous contact forms to suit your needs. We always respond to everyone.

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

We have many other characteristics and strengths, which make us unique, inimitable, and certainly the best political system and organization in the history of humanity.