Key features

Hello, you're here because you've received a flyer, or informational material, or an invitation to learn more from one of our official representatives in your urban or rural area. Or you might be here to learn about the three key features that make our DirectDemocracyS system pioneering, unique, and inimitable.

It's truly a pleasure and honor for us to have you here with us, on our platforms, and soon, if we wish, we can meet in person, in our own micro-group, to study the DirectDemocracyS system together.

We'll try to briefly summarize some key concepts and important information, but feel free to visit all the various informative articles, depending on what you're interested in knowing.

DirectDemocracyS is a comprehensive system, with a wide range of activities, all rooted in our political organization. We've decided to give politics the importance it deserves, and as you might guess from our name, we implement direct democracy.

If you want, at the right time, after consulting with trusted external experts, you can also become our official member and decide to invest and do business with us.

But why is politics essential and mandatory for us, even for investing together? Because everything is politics, and it is politics that writes the rules and laws, which tell us what we can do, how we must do it, and when. All other systems, even some attempts at direct democracy in some countries, are highly representative, thus placing great power on political parties and their various political representatives. In DirectDemocracyS, power resides with those indicated by the very name of democracy, namely, all our voters. In all other systems, power is transferred from the people to the political parties and their respective representatives; therefore, we no longer call them authentic democracies, but oligarchic partycracies, fake, incomplete, and above all temporary democracies (limited to election day and a few popular referendums). We solve the lack of democracy in a simple yet ingenious way by allowing our voters complete management and control over their political representatives, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after the elections. This is perhaps the main characteristic that makes us unique and inimitable. Think of how many problems would be solved and how many injustices would be avoided if voters could continuously decide on political choices and all laws? At this point, you might ask yourself: but I don't have the time to vote on everything continuously, and above all, I don't have the necessary skills to make competent choices, and therefore I would risk making the wrong decisions. First of all, at DirectDemocracyS, we don't spend our time voting; instead, we have very detailed implementing rules so we can all vote together, only on important issues, leaving some decisions to our groups, made up of all our official members. You might ask yourself: who decides whether something is important, and how important it is? A group to evaluate the importance of all our decisions, which all our official members can join. All it takes is a single official member, asking to upgrade something from moderately important, or from unimportant, to important, to initiate a decision-making process, and in a short time, a decision will be made either to keep the decision in the groups' hands, to have local votes, or to have everyone vote. Naturally, every official member of ours casts a vote in all international elections, and based on their citizenship and residency, they also vote at the continental level (each in their own continent), national level (each in their own country), and, of course, in each local subdivision. One of the biggest concerns many users had was whether foreigners had control over their country's decisions, and whether complete strangers could influence the decisions of their political representatives. Naturally, all fair and equitable local autonomies exist, and no foreigner votes in countries where they do not have the legal right to do so. As for expertise, which not all voters may possess, we could answer you with a simple question: are you sure that the political representatives and political parties of traditional politics are more competent, and infallible, than their own voters? The second question: do they always keep all their promises and fully implement the programs they were voted for?

Furthermore, we create groups of human specialists, also integrating multiple technologies (in a democracy of artificial intelligences, not relying solely on one, but having our own private model, a single interface with an entirely shared algorithm, controlled collectively by our official members). These groups of human and machine experts will offer all our users and all our groups all the information, explanations, and various possibilities, with the expected consequences, based on their respective capabilities. Competent people based on documented, verified, and guaranteed specializations, continuously and thoroughly tested to verify not only their skills and up-to-date knowledge, but also their reliability and corruption. In practice, each of our members is skilled and knowledgeable in specific topics, and will make their knowledge and practical assistance available to everyone. Therefore, our decisions will also be fully informed, and therefore competent.

We have open, motivated, and accountable voting methods in the various voting groups, while remaining, if desired, completely anonymous, and even invisible, externally and almost completely internally. We guarantee these options to everyone, of course, by voting in various micro-groups. For fairness, other users will see the voter's username, which can be a nickname or a random code that cannot identify actual personal data. It would not have been correct or even safe to add the votes of invisible individuals, as it could have created potentially unfair situations. Everyone must be able to see and verify that their vote has actually been counted, exactly as they individually decided.

At this point, you may be wondering: how can I be sure that my political representatives will do exactly as their constituents tell them to do on our platforms? Simply because in order to run in our closed online primaries, and subsequently, in the event of a favorable outcome, in real elections at various levels, one must first provide an irrevocable resignation, for personal reasons, as a guarantee, to their local groups, and, as appropriate, at the national, continental, and international levels. In practice, if the political representative fails to fulfill their role, which is precisely that of representative, they will be forced to resign, using the resignation provided in advance. This resignation is mandatory for every role of greater importance and responsibility throughout our system, for every type of user, and for every type of profile. Our system, and the community that comprises it, must have complete management and control over all our official representatives, who manage our system and our political organization, and over all our political representatives, at every level.

But what happens if voters decide to engage in economic and financial activities that could cause economic problems for entire countries? What if voters decide to force political representatives to pass laws that give away public money to the voters themselves, or to the entire population? And what happens if wars or invasions are declared? Voters, together with groups of specialists and their political representatives, will create a detailed, realistic program based on the various possibilities, based on the economic and financial situations, before the closed online primaries—and therefore long before the actual elections. It will never be possible to create public debt to pay bonuses that are not emergencies and truly necessary. People must always help each other, without any kind of discrimination, but never without receiving volunteer work and community service in return. We do not give gifts to layabouts, and we do not buy the votes of layabouts with undeserved gifts. This is a fundamental rule that distinguishes us from some political forces, who, using everyone's money and giving away bonuses and incomes, harm entire generations in order to gain a few more votes. This policy is not ours, and we do not use these methods. DirectDemocracyS is peaceful and will never endorse any declaration of war, invasion, special military operation, or any type of violent activity. We are not alienated from the world, so we believe it is necessary for each country to be able to defend itself, but never offensively, only defensively. We stand for preventing conflicts and resolving them without fueling spirals of violence.

You may have noticed that just to correctly and unambiguously implement the complete and continuous management and control of our voters' time on our platforms and our political representatives, we had to briefly explain some implementing rules that make this simple, fundamental rule concrete and fully functional. Here, for each sentence, we have specific informational articles that provide all the necessary details to implement this characteristic of ours that makes us pioneering, resilient, unique, and inimitable. Simple rules, to function properly, require—and we have not prepared—the complexity and detail necessary to function properly.

But we weren't satisfied with our voters' control over our representatives, our platforms, or our community. We wanted to create a shared leadership that allows all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities at every level, based on citizenship and residency, to implement true bottom-up, horizontal democracy, while maintaining fair and equitable traditional hierarchies, in a balance based on meritocracy. Simply put, we've implemented a points system that each person who joins us earns based on their concrete activities from the moment they join. This, combined with compliance with our rules and the time they spend with us, allows us to reward the best, and, if necessary, punish the worst. Equality and meritocracy always together, and continuously guaranteed to everyone who joins us. Think what all this means and the beneficial consequences for all of humanity.

Another thing that makes us pioneering, unique, and inimitable is the fact that each of our official members receives a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual share, which makes them collective owners of our entire system, our entire political organization (international for everyone, and continental, national, and local, based on residence and citizenship). Practically everything belongs to everyone, and potentially anyone who wants and meets all the requirements can become a collective owner of DirectDemocracyS, all our platforms, and all our activities. This prevents a few individuals and groups from accumulating too much power. Shared ownership solves many problems that no one before us had known how to, or had the courage to, address.

To summarize quickly and briefly.

Complete management and control of our voters, and our users, on our platforms, before, during, and after the elections.

A truly and completely shared leadership of all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities.

The collective ownership rights of all our official members, in all our activities, in all our platforms, and in our entire system.

These 3 fundamental characteristics make us pioneering, unique, and inimitable, and every rule, methodology, instruction, and subsequent motivation, every explanation, and every activity, are created to put these 3 characteristics into practice, and to make our mechanism work, for the good and interests of all, without any discrimination, whether they are inside or outside our system.