Security

For those who believe that DirectDemocracyS does not invent anything new, that it is too simple a system, but also for those who tell us that we are too complicated, we must once again explain some fundamental concepts.

Our system has many features that make it unique, inimitable, credible, functional, fair, just, loyal, sincere, orderly, organized, resilient, and secure. Our attention to every tiny detail allows us to prevent any potential problems, to always be free, democratic, self-funded, independent, neutral, competent, and professional. Unfortunately, all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations make us seem overly complicated to those who become discouraged and lack the patience to carefully study, with an open mind, all our public information, which is highly detailed but often repetitive. Because in DirectDemocracyS, everything we do, in a certain way, is connected to something else, and without a 360-degree view, we risk not understanding why we have made, are making, and will have to make certain choices in the past, present, and future.

But it is also a simple system with 4 brilliant and pioneering ideas and innovations, never before brought together in a single system.

1. Our leadership is truly and completely shared, in which each of our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identity, and therefore their right to vote, is an integral and fundamental part of everything we decide, based on very free, democratic, and, above all, correctly informed voting rules by our groups of specialists.
2. Our collective ownership right of all our official members, over the entire system.
3. The perfect balance between traditional hierarchies based entirely on merit, democracy, management, and bottom-up control. The previous sentence results in complete management and control by our voters over our political representatives, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections. At the system level, this also means complete, ongoing management and control by all our official members, over all our official representatives, and over higher-level users (who manage our system).
4. Micro-groups for a physical presence of our system, and our political organization, in every geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area of the world, up to 1,000 inhabitants, also making us independent of the Internet, technology (which we will always use anyway), and electricity.

For anyone with even a hint of insight, these four features alone brilliantly and definitively solve almost all the world's problems, making our system innovative and completely alternative to all others—certainly the best. The integration of all the necessary implementing rules allows us, all together, to create a mechanism that works perfectly, exactly the same way, both with the few initial users and potentially, over time , with the entire human population, and with all technological integrations.

Now let's talk about how legal some of our political activities are in certain countries, such as those where there is no mandate requirement, and therefore after the elections, a political representative can leave the political party with which he was elected.

In these cases, two analyses must be made: is it right to limit this ability to "change one's mind" to all political representatives, and therefore prohibit them from leaving the political party they were elected to, to join another political party, or to form their own political party, or to become independent? This freedom must be maintained and guaranteed for all! In old systems, potentially despicable situations often hide behind the guise of democratic, technically fair and just rules. Actual blackmail, internal and external struggles, and completely flawed activities often occur, almost always with hidden agendas. For us at DirectDemocracyS, the interests of the entire population always come first, and in our political organization, we take loyalty to the people we represent seriously. When a citizen votes in an election, choosing a person, they often also choose the political party to which they belong. If a political representative wishes to leave the political force that nominated and elected them, they should always be able to do so, but with the obligation to first resign from any political representative role, obtained through the people's vote. Otherwise, the relationship of trust between candidate and voter is undermined. To those who say, "You can do that in certain countries," we simply respond by saying that we, and anyone who joins us, have two security measures in place to prevent such behavior, which is a true betrayal. The first is an initial oath, taken by anyone who joins us, to respect all our rules. The second is a document of irrevocable early resignation for personal reasons, legalized and signed by each of our representatives (whether political, i.e., participants in primary elections, online, closed, or official, i.e., managers and controllers of our system).

If someone doesn't keep the initial oath—and many people try to cheat in other systems—in DirectDemocracyS, they must respect the second one, because they don't sign it after winning the real election, but rather before they can even participate in our closed, online primary elections, which are conducted as specified in our implementing rules. These resignations are available to their voters, on our platforms, which have complete management and control over their political representatives.

We are the only completely free system that implements authentic democracy, and we do so efficiently because we take seriously the roles of those who should hold all the power in a democracy (the people), and those who are merely representatives of the people in the various institutions. Before doing anything, each of our political representatives must ask permission from those who, with their vote in elections, granted them political representation in the various institutions. All our voters are continuously and comprehensively informed by groups of specialists to enable them to make informed and competent decisions. They are the protagonists, managers, and controllers of those who represent them in the structures of the state, at every level.

The irrevocable early resignation for personal reasons is an additional guarantee that voters will always be the ones to decide, as is right in a true democracy. Therefore, anyone who criticizes or seeks to obstruct this fundamental rule and methodology of ours should respect our decision, which is shared and the choice of free people who voted to perpetuate this true and continuous democracy.

There are countries where political representatives are not obligated to respect the will of their voters, but whoever is our candidate, if elected with our votes, will be obligated to respect this rule of ours, and all the others. In traditional political forces, promises are often made, which are not always fully kept. They do this to win elections, and then do what they please. With DirectDemocracyS, this is not allowed, and at the center are only the voters who command, and the political representatives who implement every decision of those who gave them the power of representation. In our system, power always remains with the people, and is not transferred for many years to political representatives, and their respective political forces. Democracy is not suspended, rendering the people powerless spectators for long periods of time; in DirectDemocracyS, power is shared, for the common good. We repeat this constantly so that everyone understands!

We're often asked: what if our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities (shared leadership) and our official members (collective owners) don't vote for our and their candidates (chosen in our closed online primaries) in the real elections? It would be foolish of them not to vote in the real elections for the people they choose to represent them politically in various institutions, but everyone is free to vote for whomever they choose, even if we hope there are very few who would prefer to vote for other political forces and other political representatives. It would certainly be a mistake on their part, a true inconsistency, a self-harm, but also a violation of their freedom.

Others ask: what if a superpower had a national president, and our voters, on our platforms, ordered a military strike, perhaps with nuclear warheads, would it be a disaster? It would be impossible because in DirectDemocracyS, any violent action is prohibited except for defensive purposes. Therefore, a direct, preemptive attack (of any kind) on another country would be impossible to vote for, and therefore impossible to order from our president. Ours is a peaceful system, which aims to implement mutual respect among all people. Many decisions by our users/voters require majorities based on the importance of the decisions to be made, with minimum quorums for approval. These vary, much like internal decisions and votes, where 50% + 1 vote is not always sufficient. We have groups to decide the various quorums for each of our votes, which all our official members can participate in.

We respond once again to those who fear that if we win elections everywhere, DirectDemocracyS would be a dictatorship of the majority over the minority. To all these people, we respond with a simple question: in all the world's democracies, in every country, who gets the votes needed to win, governs and makes the laws, for long years, without ever seeking binding advice from their voters (except for a few rare popular referendums)? We at least share power with anyone who joins us, and, very importantly, anyone who meets the requirements and respects our rules can join us, at any time, to share this enormous power with all of us, which will bring enormous collective responsibilities, which we will all assume. If everyone can join us, it is not a power reserved for a few, but a power shared with all.

If others win, govern, and make laws for many years, without ever asking anyone for anything, simply by obtaining 50% +1, everything is fine, and there is no dictatorship of the majority over the minority, but the only "problem" arises: when will we win? Let's also consider the fact that those who win often do so with massive abstentionism; in certain countries, in certain elections, even more than half of the voters don't show up to vote; therefore, the majority rightly depends only on the number of voters, and not on those entitled to vote. If we then consider that in certain countries there are coalitions that with 40% obtain majority bonuses, and govern and make laws for many years, obtaining less than 50% +1 (of actual voters), then there are "dictatorships" of minorities over majorities, and no one complains. But there are people who complain that DirectDemocracyS is a single, united political force that, if it wins, governs and makes laws alone, and if it loses the elections, it forms a healthy, honest, loyal, useful, reliable, and fair opposition. While other political forces form alliances, form coalitions, and collaborate together, we, precisely because we are united in diversity, have within us people of all political ideologies, who discuss and decide together, for the common good, based on free and democratic voting rules. We have no need for alliances, agreements, and coalitions, but at the right time, we will be able to welcome within our ranks not only political representatives from other political forces, but also entire traditional political forces who wish to join our system. We will never eliminate freedom and democracy; we will protect political pluralism and all opposition, including to ourselves.

In DirectDemocracyS the people do not delegate power:

he exercises it, monitors it and takes responsibility for it, every day.

One of the most serious problems of modern society is the lack of trustworthiness of many people, and the difficulty with which we all discover who we can trust.

If we look at the various systems, including ours recently, you have all the proof and guarantees you need to know not only which is the best, fair, secure, and honest, but also, and above all, the most reliable. DirectDemocracyS has never lied to you, manipulated you, or misinformed you. We have always been consistent and have kept every promise we made, never disappointing you. The proof is that there isn't a single negative review about us or our system. Don't worry, sooner or later, those who can't stand us, those who hate us, and especially those who fear us, will publish countless negative reviews and try to spread false information about us. We ask everyone to report every single post, message, and activity that says or insinuates anything negative about our system or anyone involved, so that all perpetrators can be immediately reported to the appropriate authorities, and we can explain the truth.

At this point, some will tell us: you are too strict, too careful about those who defame you, you are exaggerating, and above all you will teach us that it is often better to ignore those who boycott us, those who defame us, and those who try to slow us down, or stop us.

In this case, we disagree with those who claim they are superior and ignore these reprehensible behaviors. The reason is simple: DirectDemocracyS as a system was designed to be fair, equitable, professional, secure, reliable, and always honest; therefore, it is innocent of any unjust acts, both historically and currently. In essence, we are not to blame for the previous situation or for the current one, but we will assume full responsibility for everything we decide together and for everything we do, where we have the opportunity to govern and make laws. Whoever is part of DirectDemocracyS individually, or in our groups, or as a whole, our extended family, we have demonstrated courage, intelligence, and determination, creating the system and working within it for the common good. If we were previously complicit or passive and helpless spectators of all the other systems, after joining DirectDemocracyS, we have demonstrated our goodwill, becoming protagonists of our own destinies together. Therefore, we are no longer partly guilty and responsible for our past, but we are responsible for the present and the future, where we will be active and decisive. We repeat this in various phrases, and will repeat it always, to prevent foolish and meaningless statements like: "Where were you while others were doing things that were almost always wrong, with often disastrous consequences for so many people? Why did you allow certain situations to happen?"

Since we are not to blame, because DirectDemocracyS did not exist, or was not decisive, we want to maintain this “purity” not only of responsibility, but also ideological, social, and “strategic”.

When our political representatives participate in real elections and win, we will first analyze in detail all the situations preceding our victory, identifying all those responsible, and we will assume full responsibility (shared with our voters, who will be our guides and monitors) for everything we decided or did together. At the end of our political representation activities, we will reassess everything to see what has changed and improved, what has not changed or improved, and we will apologize, admitting any possible mistakes, without futile justifications, but admitting our own faults. Obviously, we hope to change and improve everyone's lives, and to avoid making mistakes, but if that happens, we won't do as everyone else does.

For these reasons, we cannot allow anyone to say false things about us, and we must fight with all our might to defend our system and everyone in it from every lie, every negative review, every conspiracy, every theory, every conspiracy, whether false, undocumented by reliable sources, and always verified. This defense is essential, if you reread all the previous sentences, to defend our honor.

Freedom of thought, speech, writing, and all other freedoms are sacred to us. Everyone can express their own ideas, provided they are true, documented, proven, and tested. There is not and must not be the freedom to lie, defame, or manipulate a system or anyone within it with falsehoods, solely for private gain. Throughout human history, and even more so with modern technology, everyone is free to express their opinion, even by lying, defaming, and manipulating. But with us, please have overwhelming evidence from reliable, well-documented sources before doing so, because we will not hesitate to report anyone who does so in an attempt to harm us.

But why don't other systems, and all other political forces, do the same? Simply because almost all of them have made so many serious mistakes, with negative consequences for many people, or have served the interests of a few against the interests of many. Almost all of them have promised without keeping their promises, have often lied, cheated, stolen, injured, sometimes killed, and many of them have not respected all the laws. Perhaps some of them have no honor to defend, or have become accustomed, in many cases, to falsehoods, and waste no time proving their point to anyone.

We invite anyone, inside or outside of us, to report any video, audio, article, post, comment, or message that speaks badly of us or any of our members, and we will analyze and explain the truth. If we are guilty in any way, we will admit our guilt, apologize, and commit to correcting all our mistakes, if possible. If we are innocent, we will defend our honor.

At this link you will find several categories of reports, with various subcategories, and as many menu items, with many contact forms:

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/reports /

Choose the most appropriate one and send us your reports. We will respond and explain our version, which will surely prove the truth. We thank you in advance for your cooperation and for your help in spreading the truth.

If you encounter content that contains false or defamatory statements, you can report it to us.

We will analyze them publicly, with documents and facts.

At DirectDemocracyS, any criticism is legitimate, as long as it is honest, verifiable, and made in good faith.

Deliberate lying and defamation are not opinions: they are abuses.

In all our informative articles, videos, audio, posts, and other means of communication, we have always clearly explained our views, and we take full responsibility for everything we have disseminated. Unlike others, we have chosen from the beginning to base our work solely on real, scientifically proven facts, supported by our teams of specialists and experts. Unlike other communities, in DirectDemocracyS, each person speaks, writes, and discusses only what they know perfectly well, either because they teach it, work with it, have studied it, taught it, or have worked with it. We have no amateurs who, without the proper expertise, inform, discuss, or spread lies, theories, conspiracies, and other falsehoods. From the very beginning, we have chosen to be professional and scientifically impeccable, even at the risk of losing many uninformed and incompetent people, who, however, have "personal convictions" based on nothing but the desire to "think" differently. We don't exclude those with alternative theories; in fact, every idea, thought, and project, even if it differs from reality, could theoretically be useful, and will be studied by like-minded people. In fact, we have various groups in our free social areas, where anyone can discuss anything, a bit like on traditional social networks, where almost everyone thinks they're an expert on any topic, resulting in many unfortunate incidents.

A system like ours cannot and must not disseminate nonsensical theories, but only what is documented, verified, and concrete. This isn't a lack of imagination, but rather everyone's real need to know the truth based on reality, with reliable, human (and in the future technological, with human management and verification), and competent experts.

In some very rare cases, however, we have responded to nonsensical theories with other (perhaps more plausible) theories. One example was when we discussed some people who were convinced that COVID-19 had never existed. Some of these skeptics, who were certainly not virologists, admitted that a virus existed, but that it had been spread by various "lobbies" to reduce the world's population. Then, with the development of vaccines (especially RNA vaccines), it was said that anyone vaccinated would die "shortly" because certain "lobbies" had decided to use these vaccines to exterminate large numbers of people. We simply wrote, specifying that this was just a theory: if the "system represented by these lobbies " wants to kill people because "there are too many of us on earth," what interest would it have in exterminating "the sheep that follow the flock" and those who respect health regulations. They would have had every interest in eliminating those who don't follow their directives, those who think "alternatively," using "their own mind" (or that of someone who enjoys making fun of you). Therefore, according to our "not entirely documented theory," if vaccines had been created "only to save those who can be manipulated," leaving the "intelligent people who talk about things they don't know" to die. The "lobbies and the system" would have no interest in "killing" those who don't cause problems and respect decisions, but would instead have more advantages in "eliminating" those who know all the "truths," simply by thinking them without knowing them at all. If their "theory" is nevertheless "respectable and possible," ours is certainly more plausible and more useful to the respective "masters of the world."

Expertise and analytical skills aren't based on theories, but on concrete facts. To declare certain things and think differently, you need to have studied, because a lie is shared by multiple people; it doesn't become true just because a few incompetent people confirm it's true. And to think that there are people who gain consensus and approval based on manipulation, envy, and social hatred, and by telling people whatever they want. We've chosen a different, and certainly better, path: always telling the truth, whether pleasant or unpleasant, without possible interpretations. Everything we disclose is so clear and direct that no one can create theories, plots, conspiracies, or fake news about us without becoming ridiculous and completely losing credibility. And let's be clear: aren't you tired of people, political forces, and entire systems telling you these things without telling you practically anything, exploiting the incompetence, laziness, and superficiality of those who trust anyone who confirms their ideas?

Everyone knows about QR codes and knows that they are very useful for finding all our web pages on our platforms.

Their usefulness isn't very obvious if someone is browsing from a mobile phone, tablet, or PC, where various URLs (links) are sufficient to navigate across all our platforms, from one operating system to another, from one subdomain to another, from one website to another, from one application to another, from one component to another, from one plugin to another, from one module to another, from one menu item to another, from one article to another, from one post to another, from one of our areas to another. In practice, one can move anywhere within our system, both virtually and physically. Public areas are and will always be visible to everyone. Of course, for some of our private areas, you must be a member to visit and work within them. Some restricted areas require specific user types, a certain number of points, and in many cases, access is only possible if you've been a member of our system for a certain period of time. There are secret areas accessible only to our members with special authorizations. These decisions are mandatory to ensure impenetrable security, the protection of our operations, and all our users. Anyone who doesn't understand them is free to criticize us, but they can't judge us. It's logical and correct to have made this decision for the good of all!

In our informational materials, gadgets, flyers, posters, and various publications, as well as in our videos and on television (in addition to various links), QR Codes are very useful because they allow anyone with a phone, tablet, or PC to take a photograph or screenshot of these very secure, encrypted, and protected codes, allowing them to access all our URLs (links) using a simple QR Code reader app. There are many of these apps, some pre-installed on your devices; choose the one you prefer.

Our microgroups require mainly 6, sometimes 7 or more QR codes: the first for a brief explanation of our system's strengths, the second to explain the purpose of our microgroups, the third to explain how to join the microgroup in your urban or rural area (up to 1,000 inhabitants), or, if you haven't yet created a microgroup near your home, to explain to anyone how they can create their own, alone or with their family, neighbors, friends, and contacts. The fourth QR code should instruct everyone how to fill out the registration form to join us, always explaining to everyone that it's not advisable to join us without an official invitation, and without being automatically connected to one of our official representatives. They can then invite you to the microgroup near your home, or help you create your own microgroup, which can be connected through you and your internal contact (usually an official representative who has already created their own microgroup). The fifth QR code is the most important because it's a registration form with a unique link (for each of our official representatives) that will automatically connect you to whoever invites you to our system. The sixth QR code is the direct contact form for each micro-group, the seventh for each official representative, and the eighth can optionally contain the official phone number of our micro-group or our official representative (or both). Everything will be decided upon by the various micro-group members, and other QR codes can be used, all of which can be easily created at this link:

https://tools.directdemocracys.org/qrcdr/

We've always explained to you that it's important to follow all our rules, all our methodologies, and all our instructions, in order to do a great job and also have fun and meet lots of new people at DirectDemocracyS.

First, you must choose whether you want to immediately unlock a wealth of potential by becoming collective owners of our entire system, or whether you're content to simply be part of our shared leadership, with voting rights, or whether you simply want to join us for free, with no obligation to attend or participate in activities with us, except voluntarily. For the two higher user levels, you must first pay the respective annual fee, obtaining a payment code based on your age (up to 31 years old, half price) and the user level you initially choose. We recommend, if possible and available, choosing the official membership level, which is the most popular among new users. It costs a little more, but offers many benefits and advantages. If you have financial difficulties, depending on your income, you can extend your initial annual membership for one, two, or up to three years after your first payment.

All higher-level users have their identities verified and guaranteed through a simple, fast, yet highly secure, discreet, and confidential identity verification video call with our official representative and our dedicated security team.

For those who don't want to pay anything and don't want their identity verified, there's a free membership. There's no obligation to be present, nor to engage in any activities with us, but it's still useful for those who aren't comfortable sending money or letting their inviters know their true identity. Free members obviously have less potential and fewer private areas to access, but it's still a good starting point because, based on voluntary activity, it allows anyone to immediately start earning points, which are incredibly valuable to us (even just for registering).

Of all these user types, only our official members will be able to become our official representatives and create their own micro-groups, based on their geographic coordinates, in collaboration with our national organizations. Only our official members will be able to participate in our micro-groups, and in subsequent phases, they will be able to participate in all our local organizations, and according to detailed rules and methodologies, they will be able to participate in our national, continental, and international organizations.

Our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities (a less important type than our official members) will still be able to participate in our shared leadership, because each micro-group (after becoming an official organization, with at least 31 members) will have a voting group (based on very detailed implementation rules) dedicated to this type of user. Again, we repeat: being an official member is worthwhile and immediately unlocks a wealth of potential, so we recommend it to everyone as the best user type.

Every official member is required to request, and if they meet all the requirements, receive, an official representative profile, simply, quickly, securely, and free of charge, linked invisibly but automatically to their personal official member profile.

The username and personalized email address (ending @directdemocracys.org) of the official representative profile will be identical to the geographic coordinates of our official representative's residence.

Each official representative will have to create their own micro-group with specific rules, methodologies, and instructions.

Let's see how micro-groups develop after their creation.

After inviting at least one person, preferably a couple (relatives, neighbors, friends, or acquaintances), because two or more people work better and can divide the various tasks, you can create flyers to distribute to your neighbors. Even just a few photocopies of the various informational materials, created and printed at your own expense or requested from our national groups at very reasonable prices and certainly looking better, will suffice.

To distribute the various flyers (or photocopies) you can do it in person, or with the help of a relative or a trusted friend (we don't want our materials to end up directly in the trash).

By spreading the word about DirectDemocracyS to your neighbors through these materials, perhaps by using our official representative's personalized email address and phone number, you can engage new people, including new official members, to reach the required 31 members for recognition as our official organization. This will bring many benefits and advantages (for example, micro-group members will be given more senior roles in our local organizations, in larger urban and rural areas).

For some, it might seem too complicated, and it might even seem like too much of an initial investment, or too much work. We understand this, even if we disagree, because we've planned to consistently reward not just everyone, but all the most active and largest micro-groups, and when the time comes, you'll receive much more than you spent.

We are not a pyramidal economic and financial system, and our businesses and investments are separate and accessible through detailed implementing rules, only after all these phases of micro-groups , which at the right time, will have very important roles, will join together, communicate, collaborate, and do many activities together, thanks to human bridges, who are official members of multiple nearby or overlapping groups, or of larger urban and rural areas, at a local, national, continental, and international level.

At this point, many people will rightly ask: what if I spend money on my annual fee, my free time, more money on flyers, or a few photocopies, and no one is interested, no one joins us? If the informational materials are used as paper airplanes, or as fans against the summer heat, or to light a fire in the fireplace, or in the wood-burning stove in the winter, you can always organize an official presentation to a few relatives, neighbors, friends, and acquaintances, in your own home, or outdoors, or by speaking about it in public places. You'll surely find many people interested, if you're a good speaker.

And if absolutely no one joins your micro-group, we'll understand and wait together for the right moment. We won't punish you; on the contrary, we'll reward your commitment with very important roles, not only in your area, but also in the larger local communities.

No one will be expelled if they cannot grow their own micro-group on their own, but will be helped to make it known, grow, managed, and controlled, at the right time, by our entire organization, and by everyone who is part of it.

Our DirectDemocracyS system and everyone involved cannot tolerate hasty and superficial judgments from those who don't study us thoroughly and with the right mindset. It bothers us that individuals, groups, political forces, and old systems seek to find every detail to negatively judge our long, hard, and complex collective work.

We support the freedom to criticize, but only if you look at our entire system from a 360-degree perspective, knowing all its details. For these reasons, we only take seriously those who are official members, with a certain number of points (which indicate personal and group commitment to our system). Those who contribute nothing to DirectDemocracyS, and don't know our internal workings, with roles that allow them to understand all our motivations, cannot judge us, and if they do, they're not credible, and almost always make a bad impression. All we need to do is tell the truth, and hasty and superficial judgments, and inconsistent criticisms, become veritable boomerangs that hit those who criticize just for the sake of criticizing.

We've always responded to every contact form received, according to our rules, methodologies, instructions, and rationale. If you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them, or we'll send you a link to one of our articles that provides a detailed answer.

We only accept constructive criticism. Simply put, if you don't like something in our system, you join us and explain what you don't like and how you'd like to change and improve the parts you don't like, integrating them with your own ideas and projects, for the greater good. If you criticize us endlessly without offering fully functional solutions that don't overturn previous work, you won't get our attention.

After these few sentences, outsiders will feel offended or disregarded, obviously wrongly. Our communication style: repetitive, direct, often vulgar, lengthy, and detailed, has very simple motivations: to be unique and inimitable, even in our style. DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved are convinced that we must always tell the truth, when it suits us, and especially when it doesn't. We must always speak about demonstrable facts, from reliable sources, leaving to others (or to our internal free groups) all theories, all suppositions (which don't become reality just because they're believed by incompetent people), conspiracies, superstitions, and conspiracy theories, unless they're scientifically proven and professionally proven. This "less imaginative" but more concrete and real method forces us to tell everyone things "face to face," confronting everyone with reality.

We have never offended anyone, we have never generalized without logical reasons, based on common sense and mutual respect. In practice, if someone offends us, denigrates us, or demonstrates incompetence and bad faith, they cannot expect us to remain silent and submit to all kinds of physical and verbal abuse, threats to us and our families, insults of all kinds, and above all, lies. We often expose them, in many cases we report them, but we don't pretend nothing has happened.

We are not vindictive, but intelligent and determined.

Initially, we used many of the criticisms to explain many things, especially the reasons behind all our choices. In very few cases, we found tiny flaws and imperfections, which we resolved effectively before they could potentially cause problems. So, thank you for allowing us to justify our decisions.

Finding real flaws in DirectDemocracyS is truly difficult, and we say this not out of presumption, as everyone believes, but because we know how we decided every single rule, every methodology, and every instruction, both public and internal.

DirectDemocracyS is a system where anyone who joins brings ideas, projects, constructive criticism, and solutions, to make it increasingly fair, equitable, and secure. We don't have a single leader or a few powerful groups, but rather we are all integral parts of a single, shared leadership, and all our official members collectively own our entire system. While the first five creators and creators, along with the subsequent 277 official members from nearly every country in the world, wrote the fundamental rules and key methodologies, unique and inimitable, everyone from user 283 onwards has also played their part. Some more so with higher user types, some less so with lower user types.

Everyone who joined us used their brains, arms, legs, and above all their hearts, for the good of all humanity, and to create a system in which each of us felt truly important and that allowed us to be the true protagonists.

Such a collective effort, destined to continue forever, with the same rules and methodologies, can hardly have a flaw, and can hardly be criticized, if fully understood. It's reality; you can't continue to confuse it with our hypothetical presumption, vanity, and delusions of grandeur. Those who consider our tone "Messianic," as if we were saviors of the world, trivialize and insult the work of all who join us. Being proud of one's work and the results achieved is a duty, and telling the world so isn't vain, but realistic.

If we respond to criticism directly, it's because it's right to make everyone understand that if we do certain things in a certain way, we have many good reasons.

It's not about being defensive, but about providing accurate information, so that everyone in the public are able to know and, above all, understand.

We don't have persecution mania, but we are aware that we are annoying many rich and powerful individuals and lobbies, creating valid and coherent competition for all other political forces and all other systems. We annoy and create fair and honest competition (by creating all our own private systems and technologies), including all means of communication (radio, television, social networks), and even small anti-system groups, because unlike them, we not only criticize other systems, but offer innovative, credible, professional, safe, fair, equitable, and perfectly functional alternatives. We harbor no hatred against anyone, we are not vindictive , but we fear no one, and we will respond intelligently and decisively to any attempt to boycott, slow us down, or stop us. But if from time to time we complain about how we are treated, marginalized, excluded, and made invisible, we do so not because we feel offended, but because those who treat us badly do so against the well-being and right to knowledge, primarily of their users, certainly not ours.

Knowing that DirectDemocracyS exists should be everyone's right, and we should have the right to spread the word, without algorithms and paid people trying to harm us. We don't wage "wars" against anyone with our existence, and anyone can join us, to be part of our system, so we're not an exclusive club, nor a secret sect. We're not a closed system, but we're committed to exceptional security measures to avoid becoming like everyone else.

Anyone who joins us is not manipulated, but is liberated from the old ideologies that severely limit their judgment. We do not inculcate "our truths," but we do not allow anyone to exploit "weaker minds" to gain unfair and undeserved advantages and benefits. For us, ethics and morality must always take into account the well-being and interests of the entire world population, without any discrimination.

One of our greatest strengths, which once again makes us unique and inimitable, is unity in diversity, exploiting every idea and every project, from anyone who joins us, rewarding merit without favoritism.

We respond to a criticism regarding favoritism: we're accused of offering too many advantages and benefits to anyone who joins us first. In essence, they're telling us that "first come, first served." Our response is simple: do you think it's wrong to offer advantages and benefits to those who join a system like ours first? Those who were first to have the patience to carefully study our system, with the right mindset, open to our innovation, deserve recognition for trusting such a seemingly "crazy" project, when not many would have done so. It will be easy to join us in the final registration stages, when, while maintaining all our security measures, we will accept virtually anyone who wants to join us, without selecting the most compatible people. All of this will be possible only because there were courageous and willing women and men who joined us in the delicate and crucial initial stages.

When the top user groups, and all the most important and responsible roles, are filled by the people who deserve them, literally anyone who joins us later will have no chance of disrupting our system. To function properly, our system must ensure unity, equality, and competence, placing the best people in the best positions, where they can express their full potential. Whether it's right to reward trust and reliability is our duty. Ultimately, benefits and perks are purely strategic: those who arrive first have less competition for top user groups and roles of greater responsibility and importance, within our just, fair, loyal, honest, and inevitable hierarchies. But new users needn't worry, because it's not enough to secure important roles; they must be confirmed every day, through concrete, declared, documented, and verified activities. New members, too, will be able to secure similar roles, even replacing those who aren't performing usefully and concretely. The second advantage is obviously the many personal and group points accumulated by those who have been with us the longest. These points are essential to realizing every benefit and benefit. Finally, there's a question we ask everyone: who do you trust more, someone you've just met, or someone you've known for a long time? Those who arrive later must work hard, over the necessary time, to demonstrate that they deserve our trust. Our trust doesn't belong to a few members or a few groups, but to our entire collective system, made up of everyone who has joined us. These are some of the reasons why we encourage everyone to join us as soon as possible and to immediately begin accumulating significant points, so they can realize their potential, for their own good, and for the good of our entire system.

We conclude by inviting you to continue criticizing us, while also offering your own solutions. But don't judge us hastily, and above all, never judge without understanding our entire system. We will continue to amaze you with our work in the future.

One of the things that most scares and worries people who don't know us is that our complete DirectDemocracyS system is made up of endless activities, including our political organization and our commercial company.

While we understand the concerns of those who haven't studied us fully, we can assure you that despite being a unified system, all our activities are clearly delineated. Even if it's not easy to see and verify from the outside that we are ethically and morally correct and have nothing illegal about us.

First and foremost, our political organization is our gateway (and exit for anyone who doesn't follow all our rules). It's not just the gateway, but also our security, as it verifies the identity of all those eligible to vote within our system. Therefore, our truly and completely shared leadership is guaranteed by our political organization. All user types are also managed and verified by our special security teams throughout our system. Therefore, all our official members, who collectively own our entire system, are selected, vetted, and appointed by our political organization. All annual dues for all user types are managed, vetted, and used entirely for our political organization.

In DirectDemocracyS, as a unitary system, three main entities have been present and active from the beginning: the political organization, the commercial company, and the charitable foundation. Each of these entities collaborates, communicates, coordinates, organizes, and carries out certain activities together with the others, but from a financial, economic, social, and political perspective, they are completely distinct and distinguishable.

A brief introduction to help you understand better.

From the beginning, we realized that changing and improving politics would not be enough to change and improve the world for the good of all. To achieve all the desired and hoped-for results, an innovative political organization, completely independent of all other political forces, was not enough. We also needed a commercial company where all our official members could initially work, so that we could then enter the global market at the right time, with our own rules and our unique and inimitable characteristics. Finally, to be able to concretely help those most in need, including through scholarships (to implement equality and meritocracy), educational activities, scientific research, and countless other activities to help the population, we created our own charitable foundation.

Sterile, silly, and illogical controversies.

To those who believe our political organization will benefit our business, we ask you to study us thoroughly, with an open mind, and then, if necessary, make your own judgments. As we were conceived, it is literally impossible for us to make decisions that only benefit ourselves, because in everything we vote on, the well-being of the entire world's population must always prevail, defending and guaranteeing the interests of all people, whether they are within us or outside , without any preference. Those who criticize us are so accustomed to the old, failed, unjust, traditional systems that what we write, say, or show seems inconceivable, and too good to be true.

We are not like the others, we are different and better.

To demonstrate this, in addition to our informative articles, we'll reveal some "secrets" about our business known only to our official members. We'll reveal some "secrets"—meaning internal workings already known to our official members—about our business.

But first, another brief introduction.

DirectDemocracyS is a comprehensive system created, managed, controlled, and implemented by a few friends who freely and democratically decided to engage in political, business, and charitable activities together. We joined forces (and are free to do so), we set ourselves rules (democratically decided), and we pledged to abide by them, all together, forever. We are constantly evolving, without ever overturning our previous work.

But let's talk business.

All our official members can request and, if they meet all the requirements, receive a system profile, invisibly linked to their personal profile, allowing them to invest and trade with us. Perhaps, at the right time, many other lower-level users, who will become mandatory official members, will also be able to obtain a system profile.

Explanation and motivation.

Everyone knows that all our official members collectively own our entire system, our entire political organization, all our platforms (websites, web servers, and all our technologies), and all our activities. We grant this right to all our official members (who have paid their annual dues, are required to be present, and have completed the mandatory activities with us) automatically through a single, non-cumulative and non-transferable individual action. This ownership right offers numerous advantages and benefits, such as the ability to have multiple profiles, invisibly linked to their personal profile. For example, they can have a political profile with their full, real name and surname, which, however, requires them to block all other profiles, including their personal profile, for the duration of their political representation. This is essential to prevent all conflicts of interest and to prevent the accumulation of power and roles of greater responsibility and importance within our hierarchies. Once you've completed your political representation activities, you can block your political representative profile and reuse it in the future with the same rules as before. However, you can regain your personal profile, along with all other official representative profiles, system profiles, and other types of profiles. They can obtain an official representative profile, which allows them to collectively manage and control our entire system. They can obtain a system profile, for business and to invest with us. They can obtain a charitable profile, to carry out charitable activities with us. There are many other types of profiles, based on our decisions and needs.

The system profile, for business and investments.

This is the only profile for those who want to do business and invest with us. Any of our official representatives (who meet all the requirements) can obtain it, as long as they have a personal official member profile (and are in compliance with their respective obligations).

You can get a system profile for free, but to invest and trade with us, you must obtain an individual share to become part of our joint investments.

Let's immediately preempt any possible protest and answer a legitimate question right away.

You're obviously wondering: didn't you say that every official member automatically owns the entire system, the entire political organization, all platforms, and all DirectDemocracyS activities? The answer is simple and logical: business and investment are not mandatory for everyone, and only those who decide to obtain a system profile to do business and invest with us must pay a fee to obtain their individual share for business and investment. This fee obviously cannot have a fixed value, like the annual fee for our official members (25 euros per year if you're 31 or older, and 12.50 euros per year if you're under 31, with financial assistance for those in need). Simply put, we could not, cannot, and will never be able to use the annual fees to join our political organization (the gateway and exit to our system), to do business and invest together. Were we to use these annual fees for other activities, we would be ethically and morally reprehensible. It would be like using our charitable foundation's funds to reward our best users, or for economic and financial activities. Money isn't something to joke about, and it should be used for the activities for which it is intended, with clearly defined and clearly controllable activities.

But let's briefly see how we do business and invest together.

First of all, the ideas and projects.

Anyone with a business and investment system profile can propose any investment, which will first be created individually, and then a working group will be immediately created to discuss, modify, select, test, vote on, and implement the idea or project (business or investment) confidentially.

Final project.

After individual and then group work, the final project is presented to the selection groups for all ideas and projects (investments and business deals). They will evaluate and review it, and if deemed suitable and useful, they will authorize and finance it in various ways, with the collaboration of many groups. Everything is conducted freely, democratically, and professionally, following the same rules as our political organization regarding leadership and ownership.

Financing.

First of all, recognition of merit, meaning that whoever has the idea, or has the project, must be part of it as the creator and creator of that specific activity (business or investment), receiving a share based on the value given to their creative activity.

There are various financing options, depending on the financial means of the person who conceived the idea. They can hold, individually or with the first working group (before presenting the idea and project to the selection groups), up to a maximum of 49.9% of the "total shares." The remaining 50.1% will be owned by the DirectDemocracyS system (our group of collective shareholders will always have an absolute majority in every deal and investment), through its internal joint stock company. Obviously, if the person who conceived the idea doesn't have the necessary funds to obtain the aforementioned divisions, we will jointly negotiate who participates in the deal, how, and with how much money, with what direct work, what tasks, and all the specific conditions.

In practice, everything will be done in a very convenient, fair, and just manner, with exceptional confidentiality and security measures.

One of the things that most scares and worries people who don't know us is that our complete DirectDemocracyS system is made up of endless activities, including our political organization and our commercial company.

While we understand the concerns of those who haven't studied us fully, we can assure you that despite being a unified system, all our activities are clearly delineated. Even if it's not easy to see and verify from the outside that we are ethically and morally correct and have nothing illegal about us.

First and foremost, our political organization is our gateway (and exit for anyone who doesn't follow all our rules). It's not just the gateway, but also our security, as it verifies the identity of all those eligible to vote within our system. Therefore, our truly and completely shared leadership is guaranteed by our political organization. All user types are also managed and verified by our special security teams throughout our system. Therefore, all our official members, who collectively own our entire system, are selected, vetted, and appointed by our political organization. All annual dues for all user types are managed, vetted, and used entirely for our political organization.

In DirectDemocracyS, as a unitary system, three main entities have been present and active from the beginning: the political organization, the commercial company, and the charitable foundation. Each of these entities collaborates, communicates, coordinates, organizes, and carries out certain activities together with the others, but from a financial, economic, social, and political perspective, they are completely distinct and distinguishable.

A brief introduction to help you understand better.

From the beginning, we realized that changing and improving politics would not be enough to change and improve the world for the good of all. To achieve all the desired and hoped-for results, an innovative political organization, completely independent of all other political forces, was not enough. We also needed a commercial company where all our official members could initially work, so that we could then enter the global market at the right time, with our own rules and our unique and inimitable characteristics. Finally, to be able to concretely help those most in need, including through scholarships (to implement equality and meritocracy), educational activities, scientific research, and countless other activities to help the population, we created our own charitable foundation.

Sterile, silly, and illogical controversies.

To those who believe our political organization will benefit our business, we ask you to study us thoroughly, with an open mind, and then, if necessary, make your own judgments. As we were conceived, it is literally impossible for us to make decisions that only benefit ourselves, because in everything we vote on, the well-being of the entire world's population must always prevail, defending and guaranteeing the interests of all people, whether they are within us or outside , without any preference. Those who criticize us are so accustomed to the old, failed, unjust, traditional systems that what we write, say, or show seems inconceivable, and too good to be true.

We are not like the others, we are different and better.

To demonstrate this, in addition to our informative articles, we'll reveal some "secrets" about our business known only to our official members. We'll reveal some "secrets"—meaning internal workings already known to our official members—about our business.

But first, another brief introduction.

DirectDemocracyS is a comprehensive system created, managed, controlled, and implemented by a few friends who freely and democratically decided to engage in political, business, and charitable activities together. We joined forces (and are free to do so), we set ourselves rules (democratically decided), and we pledged to abide by them, all together, forever. We are constantly evolving, without ever overturning our previous work.

But let's talk business.

All our official members can request and, if they meet all the requirements, receive a system profile, invisibly linked to their personal profile, allowing them to invest and trade with us. Perhaps, at the right time, many other lower-level users, who will become mandatory official members, will also be able to obtain a system profile.

Explanation and motivation.

Everyone knows that all our official members collectively own our entire system, our entire political organization, all our platforms (websites, web servers, and all our technologies), and all our activities. We grant this right to all our official members (who have paid their annual dues, are required to be present, and have completed the mandatory activities with us) automatically through a single, non-cumulative and non-transferable individual action. This ownership right offers numerous advantages and benefits, such as the ability to have multiple profiles, invisibly linked to their personal profile. For example, they can have a political profile with their full, real name and surname, which, however, requires them to block all other profiles, including their personal profile, for the duration of their political representation. This is essential to prevent all conflicts of interest and to prevent the accumulation of power and roles of greater responsibility and importance within our hierarchies. Once you've completed your political representation activities, you can block your political representative profile and reuse it in the future with the same rules as before. However, you can regain your personal profile, along with all other official representative profiles, system profiles, and other types of profiles. They can obtain an official representative profile, which allows them to collectively manage and control our entire system. They can obtain a system profile, for business and to invest with us. They can obtain a charitable profile, to carry out charitable activities with us. There are many other types of profiles, based on our decisions and needs.

The system profile, for business and investments.

This is the only profile for those who want to do business and invest with us. Any of our official representatives (who meet all the requirements) can obtain it, as long as they have a personal official member profile (and are in compliance with their respective obligations).

You can get a system profile for free, but to invest and trade with us, you must obtain an individual share to become part of our joint investments.

Let's immediately preempt any possible protest and answer a legitimate question right away.

You're obviously wondering: didn't you say that every official member automatically owns the entire system, the entire political organization, all platforms, and all DirectDemocracyS activities? The answer is simple and logical: business and investment are not mandatory for everyone, and only those who decide to obtain a system profile to do business and invest with us must pay a fee to obtain their individual share for business and investment. This fee obviously cannot have a fixed value, like the annual fee for our official members (25 euros per year if you're 31 or older, and 12.50 euros per year if you're under 31, with financial assistance for those in need). Simply put, we could not, cannot, and will never be able to use the annual fees to join our political organization (the gateway and exit to our system), to do business and invest together. Were we to use these annual fees for other activities, we would be ethically and morally reprehensible. It would be like using our charitable foundation's funds to reward our best users, or for economic and financial activities. Money isn't something to joke about, and it should be used for the activities for which it is intended, with clearly defined and clearly controllable activities.

But let's briefly see how we do business and invest together.

First of all, the ideas and projects.

Anyone with a business and investment system profile can propose any investment, which will first be created individually, and then a working group will be immediately created to discuss, modify, select, test, vote on, and implement the idea or project (business or investment) confidentially.

Final project.

After individual and then group work, the final project is presented to the selection groups for all ideas and projects (investments and business deals). They will evaluate and review it, and if deemed suitable and useful, they will authorize and finance it in various ways, with the collaboration of many groups. Everything is conducted freely, democratically, and professionally, following the same rules as our political organization regarding leadership and ownership.

Financing.

First of all, recognition of merit, meaning that whoever has the idea, or has the project, must be part of it as the creator and creator of that specific activity (business or investment), receiving a share based on the value given to their creative activity.

There are various financing options, depending on the financial means of the person who conceived the idea. They can hold, individually or with the first working group (before presenting the idea and project to the selection groups), up to a maximum of 49.9% of the "total shares." The remaining 50.1% will be owned by the DirectDemocracyS system (our group of collective shareholders will always have an absolute majority in every deal and investment), through its internal joint stock company. Obviously, if the person who conceived the idea doesn't have the necessary funds to obtain the aforementioned divisions, we will jointly negotiate who participates in the deal, how, and with how much money, with what direct work, what tasks, and all the specific conditions.

In practice, everything will be done in a very convenient, fair, and just manner, with exceptional confidentiality and security measures.

The safety measures for the various phases of micro-groups are mandatory for everyone, whether they are inside or outside.

The first security measure concerns our technologies.

We don't currently have unlimited financial resources. Annual dues, free and private donations, advertising contracts, and other sources of income prevent us from purchasing significant technology, especially since we don't buy "old stuff," but only the latest, best, and most up-to-date. We've split our subdomains into several web servers: a public one containing our official website, and a free one (which allows us to register and activate all new users). This web server is always accessible to anyone, and it does a great job.

But what happens if too many people join us at once, or visit this web server at the same time? We simply block it, or it automatically blocks itself, to avoid any problems. Unfortunately, this has happened a few times already, fortunately for a few hours, and rarely for a few days.

We have three other backup servers, which also serve as dedicated web servers. The first has restricted visibility and access, reserved exclusively for our official members with a certain minimum number of points (the most active people). The second is reserved for our super administrators and administrators, to run all the essential activities of our system. The third is used virtually exclusively by our creators and guarantors, and is used for extremely important activities that cannot be disclosed publicly. These three web servers act as backups for all the others and are always available, allowing us to carry out all essential activities, even if the other web servers are temporarily down.

In cases where the first web server is blocked, to help, respect and favor all our visitors, we intend to activate another web server, with a subdomain https://public.directdemocracys.org/

It becomes visible practically within minutes of the official and free websites going down. It does not allow new users to register or access any of our reserved areas, but it does allow existing official members to obtain important information through a special procedure or with a simple login.

The second security measure concerns our external presence and visibility, which, as everyone knows, we only use to inform those who haven't yet joined us, always after informing those who are already with us and those who visit our websites. Essentially, the order in which our information is received is this: secret areas (reserved for small groups of people), user types (from the highest in our hierarchy to the lowest, also based on accumulated points), our platforms (a world premiere and exclusive), then we inform our media partners, and finally we publish authorized information on our official accounts (users, pages, and groups) on social networks external to our platforms, apps, and other websites. This order will be maintained forever, because it is the fairest, safest, and most equitable.

Our external activities will be limited to a few occasional posts, and we will not offer any kind of information, support, invitations, or assistance outside of our platforms. This choice, though criticized by some, is also strategic, and above all, it is part of our fundamental rules. In practice, if you wish to communicate with us, you must do so by respecting all our rules, methodologies, and instructions. This also prevents problems caused by those who speak on our behalf without authorization. We have official representatives for general information and support, but for certain topics and detailed questions, only our authorized groups on our websites can provide professional and helpful support.

From now on, we will no longer publish detailed articles or long posts outside of our platforms. Instead, we will simply provide you with various secure and reliable links to view our videos (including live streams), listen to our audio (including live streams), and view our articles and posts, including live chats with our authors and authorized users. This is a very important change and improvement. If you're interested in information about us, you can see it exclusively and in preview, only on our official platforms. This also prevents misinformation, theories, conspiracies, manipulations, and potential fake news regarding our system.

Micro-groups have various phases and specific safety measures.

General and specific information about microgroups.

In various informational articles—public (visible to everyone), private (visible only after logging into our websites), or restricted (visible only to certain types of users and also based on the number of points accumulated by each individual)—we have informed you, are informing you, and will continue to inform you about our various activities at the local, state, national, continental, and international levels. We try not to overload our websites with too much information for everyone, but to inform people based on their needs, for obvious reasons we've explained several times and won't repeat for once.

Micro-group tests.

In some countries, in certain specific geographic areas, we will begin local tests for our micro-groups at the appropriate time, as we adapt them as necessary, and with the activities we deem appropriate. While these are tests, they are not micro-groups created for fun; their function and presence will be permanent, fully authorized, and integrated into our system. In practice, we won't be pretending, but every activity will forever be officially recognized, and every decision made will be binding and effective. We call them tests because they are the first micro-groups we will create, and therefore, there could theoretically be tiny problems that we will need to analyze, discuss, propose, resolve, and improve to prevent them from recurring in the future. Constant attention to every detail helps make DirectDemocracyS professional and fully functional. We will be extremely careful about everything, especially security measures, and the behavior of anyone who joins us.

Slow, gradual, rapid expansion.

The test microgroups, like all microgroups, will expand rapidly, from the outer reaches of previous groups to other neighboring urban and rural areas, continuously and very carefully. All these microgroups will be connected to each other by human bridges, members of two or more groups, allowing various groups (of all sizes) and all their members to communicate, collaborate, and carry out countless activities together.

Human bridges of micro-groups.

Human bridges within various microgroups can take many forms: an official member of the previous microgroup (residing within the external boundaries of the microgroup, or the previous group), who is present in two or more microgroups, or an official member of two or more microgroups, who, as an official representative, creates his or her own microgroup in a geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral area bordering or overlapping the initial microgroup to which he or she belonged. These physical connections also utilize all the necessary capabilities available on our platforms, such as creating connection and collaboration groups, pages, events, and a wide range of activities.

Official organizations.

According to our fundamental rules, each micro-group, when it has at least 31 members, can request and be authorized to become an official DirectDemocracyS organization, with many advantages, benefits, and enormous potential.

Union of micro-groups.

At the right time, all microgroups and all official organizations will merge with neighboring or overlapping microgroups and official organizations, forming all our various local organizations. They will do so by creating larger microgroups and larger official organizations, all the way up to the largest local levels (even integrating and merging with existing ones): street block, neighborhood, city, district, province, region, state, and group of states, and then merge and integrate with our existing and long-established national, continental, and international organizations.

It took a lot of time, a lot of effort, and a lot of hard work on the part of all our official members.

To carry out all these vital activities, we will take all the time necessary, without any rush. We will do so with the help and active collaboration of all our official members, and of course with the supervision, collaboration, support, active assistance, and all necessary authorizations from all our national, continental, and international organizations. What we do is too important to be done quickly and without everyone's commitment. Ours has always been a collective effort, so we count on the active participation of all our official members.

Some short questions and answers.

Why don't you make the areas where you'll be creating these micro-test groups public? This will prevent any potential problems, such as sabotage, attempts to slow us down, or worse, stop us.

What will be the names of political representatives' profiles (username and personalized email address ending with @directdemocracys.org), and the names of their respective microgroups? With the geographic coordinates of the center of the urban or rural area with up to 1,000 inhabitants. This rule applies to all microgroups worldwide in our system.

Will those who want to join DirectDemocracyS to create their own micro-group be helped to do so more easily and quickly, while still maintaining all safety measures? Each of our national organizations coordinates, manages, monitors, authorizes, appoints, and supports all the official representatives of their territory, who in turn follow the same procedures with their own micro-groups. Even though we all have the same rules, methodologies, instructions, motivations, and potential, some countries will be faster and more efficient, while others will take longer and may be less organized. The important thing is to have the patience, determination, and intelligence to study and understand our system.