Why should you join us

A system like DirectDemocracyS, with its solid philosophical foundations and morally and ethically just and fair ideals, even if based on simple principles and characteristics, could not function without very detailed rules and exceptional security measures. Today, we will discuss the reasons why, in order to be decisive and binding for our system, you must join us. We will not accept impositions, interference, boycotts, infiltration by front men, or negative activities against us.

But first, let's look at some general information to get to know our system.

Our philosophical foundations are all conducive to changing and improving the world, aiming to serve the general interests of the entire world's population, without any bias. In all our activities and decisions, the interests and well-being of the entire world's population are central and essential.

Our ideals are the only authentic democracy, guaranteed to all through our political organization, and complete freedom, which must be potentially infinite, both individual and group, but which ends exactly where the freedom of another person or group begins. What defines the boundaries of these two freedoms? The Law, which must be just, fair, and so detailed, and with a complete and efficient engineering architecture, as to prevent anyone from abusing it.

Our principles are logic, common sense, truth, study, reality, pragmatism, and mutual respect for all people.

Our most important features and strengths are: direct, complete, and unlimited management and control by our base—our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities—over our political representatives, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections. Think about the effects of such a fundamental rule, and consider how we apply it in exactly the same way to our official representatives, managers, and every higher hierarchy throughout our system. Truly and completely shared leadership, with all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, who decide together by voting on every one of our rules. We don't have a few leaders or small power groups; we are all one immense and comprehensive leader. We all vote according to very detailed implementing rules, which require that every vote we cast is fully informed by groups of specialists with declared, documented, demonstrated, tested, verified, and guaranteed expertise. Voting is practically always open, with very few exceptions for security reasons, because no one should be ashamed of their thoughts, preferences, or decisions. We don't expel or block those who think differently; on the contrary, the entire system thrives on and is enriched by the ideas and projects of anyone who joins us. Each vote must always be clearly motivated, explaining to one's voting group the valid reasons for the decision made. Furthermore, for every individual and group vote, we assume full responsibility for the decision made, for the person chosen, and for all the consequences of that vote. We are certainly the first, and perhaps will forever be the only ones, who clearly, openly, and concretely implement our actions, assume full responsibility, because in virtually all other systems, there are never any culprits for all the disasters that often occur due to poor choices. Of course, we will also be able to find those responsible within ourselves, not only to punish them, but to hold them accountable and prevent further poor choices. The principle of cause (the decisions made) and effect (the consequences of what is decided), which can be positive, of which one can be proud, and for which one is rewarded, or negative, for which one will be reprimanded and, if necessary, even punished.

Collective ownership right, which through a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual action makes each of our members the official, collective owner of all our platforms, all our activities, and the entire system. Now think how many problems can be avoided, through prevention, with this collective ownership, which makes us unique and inimitable.

Micro-groups for a physical, and not just virtual, presence of our system in every urban or rural area, up to 1000 inhabitants.

But why not apply our system to entire countries, or even the entire world? That's exactly what we're doing, but we've proceeded very slowly, paying close attention to every detail, to prevent any potential errors and avoid any problems.

But why "force" people to join DirectDemocracyS, instead of allowing all citizens to be protagonists and enforcers of our system, even without being part of it? First of all, DirectDemocracyS welcomes everyone, therefore it does not discriminate against anyone and does not exclude anyone who wishes to join us with the best of intentions. We are not a closed system nor a secret sect, as demonstrated by the fundamental rules we have previously described, including in this article. Our system welcomes, protects, and empowers anyone who wishes to collaborate with us within our system. One of the things people who join us notice is that we do not pretend to teach anyone anything; on the contrary, we evolve and improve enormously thanks to the ideas and constructive proposals of everyone who joins us. The second thing everyone likes is that they can finally be free from the manipulation and brainwashing attempts that so many people, and various organizations and lobbies, attempt outside of us. Let me give you a few examples: since childhood, we have always been divided by nationality, ethnicity, culture, tradition, language, religion, and above all, by political ideology. But not only that: we have advertising, multimedia, and even influencers who constantly and persistently teach us (even if not always visible to everyone, due to our habit of being manipulated): what to buy, what to sell, what to invest in, what to prefer, what to vote for, what to say, what to do, what to think, and even who to love. The supposed freedom of choice almost never fully exists, so applying our system to the entire world population, or to individual countries, without "obliging" those who want to be decisive and binding on our choices to join us would be a grave mistake. A population unprotected (by our exceptional security systems), not fully informed, competent, free, independent, neutral , loyal, honest, sincere, and incorruptible by our teams of specialists, both human and technological, and not subject to very detailed, universally respected rules that make DirectDemocracyS function for the common good, and without users who truly think with their own brains, and not those of others, would have no beneficial effects, for the good of all. Some fundamental things would be missing. First, paying an annual fee, which guarantees our system, and therefore all of us, self-financing, making us self-sufficient, free, neutral, independent, and incorruptible, without being servants of various lobbies, and the rich, famous, and powerful. Second, joining DirectDemocracyS means working concretely together with all of us, with a mandatory presence of at least 20 minutes a day, with one or more daily logins, or alternatively, at least 120 minutes a week, on one or more days, with one or more logins, to ensure our enormous mechanism functions perfectly. Without the concrete and ongoing commitment of all those who join us, our system cannot function, and if people are not "forced" to join us, to work on our platforms, in a direct, concrete, documented way, and with mutual verification, we would not achieve excellent results. From the outside, we could not reward the best and punish the worst. We would not be guaranteed continuous and evident equality for all (verifiable by the points accumulated by each of our users), always combined with meritocracy. If equality and meritocracy are not consistently applied, a system cannot progress, because competition, concrete results, and good ideas are lacking.

In short: the world population, or national, and even local, does not have the right mentality, and the habit, of holding all the power, having the detailed rules (which we have always had), and also knowing how to manage all this power.

But what could happen in a company, a country, or at a local level, where the ideas and projects of DirectDemocracyS were applied externally, without the "mandatory" presence of everyone in the system? We had also thought about this in the first minutes of group work, to lay the foundations and the fundamental rules of our system, give it to the world, and apply it everywhere. We ran some simulations, some detailed forecasts, and we immediately realized that it would be completely wrong, and even dangerous. And we don't say this out of pessimism, or because we want riches, fame, and power only for ourselves, because since DirectDemocracyS belongs to everyone, everything is shared, so those who had the initial ideas, the first 5 "creators," and the subsequent 277 who created the fundamental rules, receive a "reward" out of gratitude for their excellent work, 1% of the money we receive. So, not huge sums in the short and medium term, but they will certainly earn a lot, deserving every single cent, when we become a large number of users. We're doing this because we've studied all the implications of a DirectDemocracyS for everyone, without anyone having to join. Apparently, it sounds wonderful: grassroots democracy, everyone deciding everything, a fake but seemingly authentic democracy, complete freedom, and power to all the people. It would be a wonderful political revolution, but it would only be a mirage, and short-lived. Then, however, the lobbies—rich, powerful, and even famous people—would infiltrate the system, and through front men or a few influencers, perhaps with prizes, bonuses, free income, and media manipulation, financially corrupting and brainwashing the majority, a 50% + 1, in the name of "democracy," they could do what they've always done, even with representative "democracy" (which they transform into an oligarchic partycracy after the elections). They would only serve the interests of a few, by dint of continuous popular referendums, having guaranteed an absolute majority (to simulate the internal, protected, and competent votes in DirectDemocracyS). They wouldn't decide based on complacent political parties and representatives, but by using democracy in an undemocratic manner. At that point, there would be nothing to do, and nothing to object to. The lobbies would have won again, and their failed systems would continue to prosper, thanks to majorities of people, corrupted with public money, and therefore of everyone. They could never do that here, thanks to rules that can predict unpleasant and wrong situations. Among these rules, we remind you that we have minimum and maximum quorums, based on the importance of the decision to be made, not just a simple majority, or a simple majority of those entitled to vote, with percentages of 66% for important decisions, 75% for very important decisions, and percentages of 85%-95% for extremely important rules, and unanimity for fundamental rules (so as not to distort our ideas and never lose our identity). But also through the use of large electors, in various micro-groups, which make voter manipulation, infiltration, multiple profiles, and fronts impossible. There are separate votes, through the implementation of user types, and many other rules, which protect our entire system, and anyone who joins us.

No traditional political force allows all citizens to control it and decide its internal rules: only its members or leaders do so.
DirectDemocracyS follows the same logical principle—those who want to be decisive and binding must be part of it—but with a fundamental difference that makes us radically different and superior: we offer truly and completely shared leadership, collective ownership of the entire system, continuous control over representatives (before, during, and after elections), and continuous direct democracy protected by detailed rules, competency checks, and individual accountability. This makes us more democratic, freer, more independent, safer, and more incorruptible than any other existing political system.

With these predictions, we have decided that only those who join us, respecting all our rules, can be decisive and binding on our system, which belongs to all who join us. When everyone within us has learned to harness the enormous power we will inevitably wield together, to avoid manipulation, to be united in diversity, not divided in equality, and to truly think for themselves, with a fair and open mind, and our unique and inimitable style, everyone in the world will be able to join DirectDemocracyS, and with initial and subsequent users, the entire world will finally be able to enjoy true democracy, and complete and potentially infinite, yet protected, freedom.